Fr. Elias is the Benedictine Monk responsible for the Church at the
Dormition Abbey on Mount Zion. On the first Saturday of Advent, he
shared his thoughts about how his community is preparing for the coming
feast of the Nativity of Christ.
“During Advent, we light four
candles on the Advent crown, symbolizing the four weeks before
Christmas. Every week, we light one more candle. We have special
songs, special prayers, and special readings, especially from the
prophet Isaiah because he expresses a message of comfort and hope.”
Fr.
Elias explains that the Benedictine community cherishes a particular
German tradition: a special liturgy, every Friday evening of Advent,
when they use no electric lights but only candle light to experience
the darkness characteristic of the longing for the Messiah.
“Advent
is not Christmas” says the Benedictine monk, “it’s a time of longing,
of hope, of expectation, of desire.” For this reason, the community
doesn’t sing Christmas songs until Christmas itself. Before that, only
Advent songs are sung.”
“Then, on Christmas Eve, we have a party
with all our volunteers and all our guests. At midnight we have our
solemn liturgy with Christmas decorations and typical German songs such
as “Silent Night, Holy Night.”
After the liturgy, at about 2:30am, the whole community, including the volunteers and students, walk to Bethlehem.
“So I guess you don’t sleep much that night?” I ask him.
Fr.
Elias smiles: “We sleep in the morning. We go to the grotto in
Bethlehem to pray there, then we go home, sleep a bit, and then we have
the solemn Mass at 11 am on Christmas day.”
The Dormition Abbey
is known to attract hundreds of curious Israeli visitors every year on
Christmas Eve, so I asked Fr. Elias about them. His first comment was
that they have so many visitors that they really need a bigger church
on that evening, as space is very limited.
But why so many
Israeli guests, especially considering that the liturgy is celebrated
in German? Why is it so attractive to them?
Fr. Elias shrugs with a smile:
“Don’t
ask me. It’s the same thing in the Lutheran church. We have the same
liturgy in this form every day throughout the year, but this night is
really a particular night because we sing the typical Christmas songs
that everyone knows and loves. People like our style of liturgy, and
we have an organ, a choir, singers. We also speak a bit in Hebrew, but
the people really want to see and experience how we celebrate a German
Christmas.”
The Benedictine monk then underlines the universal attraction of Christmas:
“Also
in Germany the Masses are full, because there is a special atmosphere
during this period. Christmas time is touching: it’s a time of
longing, a time for the family, with deep, universal symbols that
everyone can understand. The story of Mary and Joseph finding no room
at the inn, giving birth to a baby in poverty… this is a touching story
that speaks to everyone.
Fr. Elias has been 13 years in the Holy Land. Has he seen any change in the celebration of Christmas over the years?
“It’s
more or less the same. In the last years it has become more
commercial. People have started to come with red and white caps, but
this is not German: it comes from the United States and from Coca
Cola. We try to preserve the Christmas traditions and focus on the
real story of the Bible, and not what is done with Santa Claus, or in
advertizing and commercials. People here in Israel have some ideas of
Christmas that they get from TV, but it’s not the true picture of
Christmas.”
I asked Fr. Elias whether Israelis might be more open to the Gospel on Christmas or whether they just come out of curiosity.
“It’s
mostly curiosity,” he replies. “We also, our volunteers and students,
are also interested in how Jews celebrate. Sometimes we go to the
synagogue, we pray the psalms every day, and we try to understand their
customs. We welcome the people, but we know that they are not
Christians, and some things in our liturgy are only for Christians. We
don’t have papers where they can apply for baptism, and they are free
to come and go without any obligations.”
Because of the wide
cultural differences between Jewish and Christian forms of worship,
between the Synagogue and the Church, the Benedictines need to instruct
their Israeli guests on the basics of church etiquette:
“At the
beginning of the celebration, we have to explain to them how to behave,
because many people don’t know what to do in this setting. And so we
have to tell them: ‘please do this, and do this…’ Usually it works. We
have a different style of prayer, yet our liturgy is very close to the
Jewish liturgy.”
Showing posts with label christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christ. Show all posts
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Monday, February 14, 2011
Quiz: Are you living out the Church's mission of evangelization?
I am not the most punctual person in the world. Since the AHC
conference last October I have wanted to write about the topic of
evangelization and proselytism. This project, however, was trumped in
our last newsletter by our commentary on Israel
as "womb" of the Second Coming,
as a response to the controversy
with a Palestinian priest on the topic
of "Catholics for Palestine" and "Catholics for
Israel."
Today, the moment has come. I feel that the topic of evangelization and proselytism is timely for at least two reasons.
The first reason is the urgency of the task of the new evangelization, urgent because formerly Christian countries are seriously threatened on two fronts - by an increasingly aggressive anti-Christian secularism on the one hand, and the equally aggressive growth of Islam on the other.
The second reason is the considerable confusion that seems to reign among many Christians and especially Catholics regarding evangelization and proselytism. Confusion on this topic now would be nothing less than disastrous if it results in neutralizing believers from carrying out precisely the Church's most critical task of our time. It would not be an exaggeration to even characterize as "work of the devil" any thought construct that would lead to the paralysis of the Church's central mission.
And so today we ask the questions: What is evangelization? What is proselytism? What is the difference between them? How should we relate to non-believers? Should we try to convert them? Or just accept and love them the way they are?
Some would have us believe that proselytism is a great problem nowadays, displaying great disrespect for people of various faiths, religions and walks of life. But is this really the case - in light the Church's definition of proselytism - or is the real problem actually quite the opposite?
Before we go any further I would like to invite you to do a little self-evaluation quiz. This test will help you to determine where you stand - whether you are being faithful to the Church's call to the new evangelization, and if not, what may be some of the false presuppositions or ideas lurking "below the surface" that are hindering you from responding to the call. The quiz will also hopefully help to make the rest of this article more interesting and relevant to you.
So without further ado, why don't you go ahead and take the quiz now...
Today, the moment has come. I feel that the topic of evangelization and proselytism is timely for at least two reasons.
The first reason is the urgency of the task of the new evangelization, urgent because formerly Christian countries are seriously threatened on two fronts - by an increasingly aggressive anti-Christian secularism on the one hand, and the equally aggressive growth of Islam on the other.
The second reason is the considerable confusion that seems to reign among many Christians and especially Catholics regarding evangelization and proselytism. Confusion on this topic now would be nothing less than disastrous if it results in neutralizing believers from carrying out precisely the Church's most critical task of our time. It would not be an exaggeration to even characterize as "work of the devil" any thought construct that would lead to the paralysis of the Church's central mission.
And so today we ask the questions: What is evangelization? What is proselytism? What is the difference between them? How should we relate to non-believers? Should we try to convert them? Or just accept and love them the way they are?
Some would have us believe that proselytism is a great problem nowadays, displaying great disrespect for people of various faiths, religions and walks of life. But is this really the case - in light the Church's definition of proselytism - or is the real problem actually quite the opposite?
Before we go any further I would like to invite you to do a little self-evaluation quiz. This test will help you to determine where you stand - whether you are being faithful to the Church's call to the new evangelization, and if not, what may be some of the false presuppositions or ideas lurking "below the surface" that are hindering you from responding to the call. The quiz will also hopefully help to make the rest of this article more interesting and relevant to you.
So without further ado, why don't you go ahead and take the quiz now...
[Quiz no longer available]
Well, how did you do?
Allow me to take a guess: My guess is that not too many Catholics are guilty of proselytism. I suspect that more of us are influenced and affected by the secular humanist or post-modernist/relativistic worldview.
Now let's look at a few definitions to help us better understand the results of the quiz. The Church has spoken profusely about evangelization and mission in the last forty years, and so we don't suffer from a lack resources on the topic. For the sake of simplicity, however, I will quote here from only one document - the most recent one published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, called rather unimaginatively Doctrinal Note on Some Aspects of Evangelization (hereafter DNE). It is neither the best nor the most inspiring text, but it is relatively short, simple, straightforward and perfectly adequate for our purposes (I will list some of the other documents at the end of the newsletter).
Evangelization
What, then, is evangelization?
Evangelization "sums up the Church's entire mission." It consists in "the proclamation and handing on of the Gospel, which is 'the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes' (Rom 1:16)." It is to "proclaim Jesus Christ by one's words and actions." Note that the document specifies that actions only are not enough; they must be accompanied by words to effectively transmit the Gospel of salvation to others. Every person has the right to hear the good news, and this implies that every Christian has a corresponding duty to evangelize. The gravity of this task is poignantly expressed in St. Paul's words: "Woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel!" (1 Cor 9:16). And the primary objective of evangelization? It is to "help all persons to meet Christ in faith" (DNE 2).
Where is Christ most especially encountered? Through incorporation into the community of believers, that is, in the Church. And so "since the beginning, the Gospel, in the power of the Spirit, is proclaimed to all people so that they might believe and become disciples of Christ and members of his Church." The desire that people be saved through communion with Jesus in the Church is not something to be ashamed of. On the contrary, "the Christian spirit has always been animated by a passion to lead all humanity to Christ in the Church" (DNE 9).
Proselytism
But isn't this desire to make people Catholics precisely what constitutes proselytism? No, it is not, and this is precisely wherein lies the modern-day confusion.
Proselytism, actually, is using "deception, selfish motives or arrogance" in trying to convert people, thus "failing in respect for the dignity and religious freedom of the partners in dialogue. For this reason, the Church severely prohibits forcing people to embrace the faith or leading or enticing them by improper techniques" (DNE 8). In other words, proselytism is the "promotion of a religion by using means, and for motives, contrary to the spirit of the Gospel; that is, which do not safeguard the freedom and dignity of the human person" (DNE 12; n. 49).
How then are we to avoid proselytism? In the task of Evangelization, everyone should "'refrain at all times from any kind of action which might seem to suggest coercion or dishonest or improper persuasion, especially when dealing with poor or uneducated people" (DH 4). In short, "the witness to the truth does not seek to impose anything by force, neither by coercive action nor by tactics incompatible with the Gospel" (DNE 12).
Simple enough? Don't force people into the faith at gunpoint (or the equivalent - through fear, guilt trips, etc...). Inviting people into the faith, however, is quite another matter.
"I don't proselytize": Respect for others or cop-out from one's duty to evangelize?
I have mentioned above that many people nowadays see proselytism as a big problem - a terribly disrespectful and intolerant thing to do. Put on the defensive by such criticism, one often hears Catholics - even some involved in missionary work - assuring us that they "don't do" that awful thing, proselytism. But what do they mean by that? The next time you hear someone make such a statement, ask them to clarify. Do they mean:
Relativism: The Great Enemy of Evangelization
Under the leadership of Benedict, the Church has tackled the bull of relativism by the horns. In our document, she expresses her concern for the "growing confusion" today which
Important Church Documents on Mission and Evangelization
Second Vatican Council - Decree on the Mission Activity of the Church Ad Gentes (1965)
Pope Paul VI - Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi (1975)
Pope John Paul II - Encyclical Letter Redemptoris Missio on the permanent validity of the Church's missionary mandate (1990)
Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith - Declaration Dominus Iesus on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church (2000)
Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith - Doctrinal Note on Some Aspects of Evangelization (2007)
See also Catholics for Israel's PowerPoint presentation:
Go into all the World! The Church's Missionary Mandate
Well, how did you do?
Allow me to take a guess: My guess is that not too many Catholics are guilty of proselytism. I suspect that more of us are influenced and affected by the secular humanist or post-modernist/relativistic worldview.
Now let's look at a few definitions to help us better understand the results of the quiz. The Church has spoken profusely about evangelization and mission in the last forty years, and so we don't suffer from a lack resources on the topic. For the sake of simplicity, however, I will quote here from only one document - the most recent one published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, called rather unimaginatively Doctrinal Note on Some Aspects of Evangelization (hereafter DNE). It is neither the best nor the most inspiring text, but it is relatively short, simple, straightforward and perfectly adequate for our purposes (I will list some of the other documents at the end of the newsletter).
Evangelization
What, then, is evangelization?
Evangelization "sums up the Church's entire mission." It consists in "the proclamation and handing on of the Gospel, which is 'the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes' (Rom 1:16)." It is to "proclaim Jesus Christ by one's words and actions." Note that the document specifies that actions only are not enough; they must be accompanied by words to effectively transmit the Gospel of salvation to others. Every person has the right to hear the good news, and this implies that every Christian has a corresponding duty to evangelize. The gravity of this task is poignantly expressed in St. Paul's words: "Woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel!" (1 Cor 9:16). And the primary objective of evangelization? It is to "help all persons to meet Christ in faith" (DNE 2).
Where is Christ most especially encountered? Through incorporation into the community of believers, that is, in the Church. And so "since the beginning, the Gospel, in the power of the Spirit, is proclaimed to all people so that they might believe and become disciples of Christ and members of his Church." The desire that people be saved through communion with Jesus in the Church is not something to be ashamed of. On the contrary, "the Christian spirit has always been animated by a passion to lead all humanity to Christ in the Church" (DNE 9).
Proselytism
But isn't this desire to make people Catholics precisely what constitutes proselytism? No, it is not, and this is precisely wherein lies the modern-day confusion.
Proselytism, actually, is using "deception, selfish motives or arrogance" in trying to convert people, thus "failing in respect for the dignity and religious freedom of the partners in dialogue. For this reason, the Church severely prohibits forcing people to embrace the faith or leading or enticing them by improper techniques" (DNE 8). In other words, proselytism is the "promotion of a religion by using means, and for motives, contrary to the spirit of the Gospel; that is, which do not safeguard the freedom and dignity of the human person" (DNE 12; n. 49).
How then are we to avoid proselytism? In the task of Evangelization, everyone should "'refrain at all times from any kind of action which might seem to suggest coercion or dishonest or improper persuasion, especially when dealing with poor or uneducated people" (DH 4). In short, "the witness to the truth does not seek to impose anything by force, neither by coercive action nor by tactics incompatible with the Gospel" (DNE 12).
Simple enough? Don't force people into the faith at gunpoint (or the equivalent - through fear, guilt trips, etc...). Inviting people into the faith, however, is quite another matter.
"I don't proselytize": Respect for others or cop-out from one's duty to evangelize?
I have mentioned above that many people nowadays see proselytism as a big problem - a terribly disrespectful and intolerant thing to do. Put on the defensive by such criticism, one often hears Catholics - even some involved in missionary work - assuring us that they "don't do" that awful thing, proselytism. But what do they mean by that? The next time you hear someone make such a statement, ask them to clarify. Do they mean:
"I don't use any dishonest, deceptive or coercive measures to try to convert people" (the right answer!)Or do they mean, rather:
"I have no interest at all (or lack the courage) to help people come to salvation by inviting them, in respect and love, to repent of their sins, accept Christ's forgiveness and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit through faith and communion with the Church." (If this is what they mean, they will probably tend to muddle the answer a bit).Sadly, I fear that too many Christians who claim to not proselytize really mean that they don't evangelize. Perhaps they are simply intimidated be the daunting task, and this is understandable. But perhaps they have fallen prey to what Pope Benedict has calledthe "dictatorship of relativism," that symptom of the post-modern world which refuses to accept any truth as definitive apart from one's own subjective whims.
Relativism: The Great Enemy of Evangelization
Under the leadership of Benedict, the Church has tackled the bull of relativism by the horns. In our document, she expresses her concern for the "growing confusion" today which
"leads many to leave the missionary command of the Lord unheard and ineffective. Often it is maintained that any attempt to convince others on religious matters is a limitation of their freedom. From this perspective, it would only be legitimate to... invite people to act according to their consciences, without aiming at their conversion to Christ and to the Catholic faith. It is enough, so they say, to help people to become more human or more faithful to their own religion; it is enough to build communities which strive for justice, freedom, peace and solidarity. Furthermore, some maintain that Christ should not be proclaimed to those who do not know him, nor should joining the Church be promoted, since it would also be possible to be saved without explicit knowledge of Christ and without formal incorporation in the Church" (DNE 3).Quite opposite to this relativistic mentality, the Church invites us not to lose confidence in the truth and goodness that Jesus the Messiah has come to reveal to humanity. For this reason,"love impels the followers of Christ to proclaim to all the truth which saves" (DNE 10) - the truth which is Jesus Christ Himself. As then cardinal Ratzinger said a few years ago, "mission and dialogue should no longer be opposites but should mutually interpenetrate. Dialogue is not aimless conversation: it aims at conviction, at finding the truth; otherwise it is worthless" (Many Religions, One Covenant, p. 112). Interreligious dialogue is thus not an end in itself but rather a "moment" in the Church's mission of evangelization (AG 11-12).
Let us, then, not lose heart, and may we work with renewed ardor
to testify to the risen Lord with all our being, in our witness of holiness
and in our words. Let's not forget
that "even witness by itself is not enough because even the finest witness will
prove ineffective in the long run, if it is not explained, justified – what
Peter called ‘giving a reason for the hope that is in you’ (1 Pet 3:15) – and
made explicit by a clear and unequivocal proclamation of the Lord Jesus'" (DNE
11).
Second Vatican Council - Decree on the Mission Activity of the Church Ad Gentes (1965)
Pope Paul VI - Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi (1975)
Pope John Paul II - Encyclical Letter Redemptoris Missio on the permanent validity of the Church's missionary mandate (1990)
Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith - Declaration Dominus Iesus on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church (2000)
Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith - Doctrinal Note on Some Aspects of Evangelization (2007)
See also Catholics for Israel's PowerPoint presentation:
Go into all the World! The Church's Missionary Mandate
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
